Научный журнал “Вестник НИИ гуманитарных наук при Правительстве Республики Мордовия”
The journal “Bulletin of the Research Institute of the Humanities by the Government of the Republic of Mordovia”
Chernyshov S. A.
Introduction. The article discusses the results of a continuous digital corpus analysis of the Siberian Chronicles to answer the research question about the relationship between descriptive-narrative and conceptual-moralizing discourses in these texts. The potential of traditional methods for solving this research problem has been exhausted, consensus conclusions have long been made. However, a significant gap in modern Siberian studies is the lack of research related to the digital (mathematical) analysis of the texts of the Siberian Chronicles.
Materials and methods. The texts of the Siberian Chronicles from the classical edition prepared by the Imperial Archaeographic Commission in 1907 were taken as the basis for the study. The texts were digitized and subjected to technical processing. To systematize lexemes, we have developed a system of semantic categories based on traditional ideas about the structural and content characteristics of the Siberian chronicles.
Results and discussion. On the basis of a textometric analysis, which is carried out for the first time in relation to the Siberian Chronicles, it is concluded that this corpus of texts is mainly dominated by the narrative nature of the presentation, a restrained and balanced description of the characters (including the enemy) and events. In general, the frequency of descriptive lexemes and word forms in all chronicles (even the Remezov one) is 4—5 times higher than in religious and ideological ones, which allows us to correct the traditionally established idea of the structural and content nature of the Siberian Chronicles. There is no pronounced “statist” position in any of the groups of chronicles, even the term “tzar” is used in them more often in relation to Kuchum than to Ivan Vasilyevich and Fyodor Ivanovich combined. The Siberian Chronicles are not “Moscow-centric” texts, since none of the chronicles is dominated by these discourses.
Conclusion. A continuous digital corpus analysis of the Siberian Chronicles made it possible to draw several research conclusions, partly confirming and, at the same time, refuting the traditional discourses about the structural and content nature of these texts. In the context of the relationship between descriptiveness and moralism, the Siberian Chronicles can be generally characterized as texts of a descriptive nature, restrained and balanced in tone of narration, with some dominance of religious and church discourses in the Remezov Chronicle.
Keywords: Siberian chronicles, Ermak, Kuchum, Stroganovs, Russian conquest of Siberia, mathematical methods in history
Funding: The study was carried out within the framework of the Presidential grant of the Russian Federation for state support of young Russian scientists — PhD candidates MK-5529.2021.2 “The Russian Conquest of Siberia as a General Russian Discourse: a Digital Analysis of the Backbone Ideas of the Siberian Chronicles”.
For citation: Chernyshov SA. Correlation of Moralism and Descriptiveness in the Texts of the Siberian Chronicles (the results of a continuous digital analysis of famous texts). Bulletin of the Research Institute of the Humanities by the Government of the Republic of Mordovia. 2023;15(1):62—80. EDN HEABKR
1. Bakhrushin SV. Scientific Works. Moscow;1955;3;1. (In Russ.)
2. Blazhes VV. Folklore of the Urals: Folk Story about Yermak. Yekaterinburg; 2002. (In Russ.)
3. Borodkin LI, Milov LV, Morozova LE. To the Question of the Formal Analysis of the Author’s Features of Style in the Works of Ancient Rusʼ. Mathematical Methods in Historical-economic and Historical-cultural Studies. Moscow;1970;298—326. (In Russ.)
4. Vlasenko NA, Kuzminskaya NL, Maksimenko AA. Textometric Studies of Multilingual Scientific Texts. Control Systems and Machines. 2009:43—47. (In Russ.)
5. Vovina-Lebedeva VG. On the History of Chronicle Collections of the 17th — 18th Centuries. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Ser. History, philology. 2012;12:109—116. (In Russ.)
6. Gagarina DA, Kornienko SI. Digital Optics: Micro and Macro in Historical Research. Bulletin of the Perm University. History. 2019;(3):175—184. (In Russ.)
7. Garskova IM. New Trends in Computerized Text Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Technologies. History. 2015;6;(8). URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001255-9-1 (In Russ.)
8. Dergacheva-Skop EI. Siberian Chronicle in the All-Russian Literary Context of the Late 16th — Mid-18th Centuries. Аbstrakt Dis. … Dr. Philol. Sci. Yekaterinburg;2000. (In Russ.)
9. Zhurova LI. Functions of the Beginning and End of the Narrative in the Siberian Chronicles (Group of the Esipov Chronicle). Humanities in Siberia. 2016;23(3):47—52. (In Russ.)
10. Inyutina LA. Lexical Representation of the Concept of the Conquest of Siberia in the Annals of the XVII — XVIII Centuries. Scientific Dialogue. 2018;(3):62—75. (In Russ.)
11. Katargina MN. Literary History of the Kungur Chronicle. Dergachev Readings-96. Russian Literature: National Development and Regional Features. Abstract Report and Messages Scientific Conferences. Yekaterinburg;1996;38—40. (In Russ.)
12. Lotman YuM. Culture and Explosion. Moscow;1992. (In Russ.)
13. Lotman YuM. The Structure of a Literary Text. Moscow;1970. (In Russ.)
14. Romodanovskaya EK. Siberia and Literature of the 17th Century. Selected Works. Novosibirsk;2002. (In Russ.)
15. Rostovtseva YuA. Siberian Chronicles in the Context of the Biblical Tradition: the History of Yermak as a Christian Archeological Plot. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. 2011;(343):19—22. (In Russ.)
16. Solodkin YaG. The Final Defeat of Kuchum (1598) in the Siberian Chronicle Tradition. Bulletin of the Nizhnevartovsk State University. 2015;(4):23—28. (In Russ.)
17. Solodkin YaG. Chronology of the “Siberian Capture” in the Russian Chronicle of the End of the 16th—17th Centuries. Ancient Rus’. Questions of medieval studies. 2011;(4):52—57. (In Russ.)
18. Urushadze AT. What is Russia? Diversity as a Way to Describe the Russian Empire. Novoe Proshloe = The New Past. 2019;(2):8—18. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2500-3224-2019-2-8-18
19. Khudyakov YuS. Analysis of Historical Information and Images of Siberian Tatar Warriors on Miniatures of the Remezov Chronicle. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Ser. History, philology. 2013;12(7):205—212. (In Russ.)
20. Shumkova NV. Conflicting Narratives in the Historical Memory of Modern Russian Youth. Bulletin of the Research Institute for the Humanities by the Government of the Republic of Mordovia. 2019;(4):145—155. (In Russ.)
Information about the author:
Sergey A. Chernyshov, Senior Researcher, Faculty of Historical and Political Sciences, National Research Tomsk State University (36 Lenina Str., Tomsk 634050, Russia), Candidate of Historical Sciences, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-7125, firstname.lastname@example.org
Conflict of interest: the author declare no conflict of interest.
The author read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The article was submitted 30.11.2022; approved after reviewing 14.01.2023; accepted for publication 19.01.2023.